PSYCHOLOGICAL READINESS OF STUDENTS FOR INDEPENDENT LEARNING IN THE CONTEXT OF DISTANCE EDUCATION

Introduction

Distance learning has become an integral part of the educational system in the context of digitalization and global changes, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. With the transition to the online format, an important aspect of the success of the educational process is the psychological readiness of students for self-directed learning. This includes the ability to effectively organize their study activities, manage time and motivation, as well as overcome potential psychological barriers related to isolation and stress.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the psychological readiness of students for self-directed learning in the context of distance education and identify the factors influencing the successful adaptation of students to the online learning format.

Research objectives:

• To study the impact of various factors (individual, social, technological) on the psychological readiness of students for distance learning using the case study method and comparative analysis.
• To evaluate the effectiveness of existing solutions and approaches to preparing students for self-directed learning in the context of distance education.
• To develop recommendations for increasing the psychological readiness of students for self-directed learning in the online format.
• To identify trends in the development of distance education and predict possible changes in the organization of the educational process.

Case study method in studying psychological readiness of students

The case study method involves detailed descriptions and analysis of real-life situations in which students face problems related to distance learning. We consider several typical cases that reflect various aspects of psychological readiness and student reactions in the online education environment [1].

We surveyed five graduates from Dagestan state university who studied under the conditions of distance education. Each of them encountered different difficulties related to online learning, which allowed us to cover several aspects of psychological readiness.

Research process

We selected students who completed their studies during the pandemic and went through distance learning. These were graduates representing various faculties and fields: economics, psychology, engineering, humanities, and others. Students were chosen based on their experience with online learning over several semesters. For each graduate, a personalized questionnaire was prepared, including questions covering key aspects of the remote learning process. The questions were aimed at assessing self-organization and time management skills, which allowed us to determine how effectively students managed their schedules and workload. Additionally, the psychological condition of the graduates and their adaptation to distance learning were studied, including stress levels, motivation, and perception of changes in the educational environment. The questionnaire also included questions about technical problems and their impact on the educational process, which helped identify technological barriers that could have lowered the quality of education and affected student performance.

Each graduate was asked to answer questions during an online interview. The students shared their impressions, described specific difficulties they faced, and discussed the solutions they applied to overcome these issues. We carefully analyzed the students’ responses, highlighting key points that illustrated problems and psychological readiness for learning in the context of distance education. The case study method allowed us to gain a comprehensive understanding of the variety of situations students encounter in distance learning. The results of the study provide a clear understanding not only of the difficulties but also of the solutions that helped students cope with these problems and adapt to the new format.

Now, after describing the general approach to the methodology of the study and the characteristics of the participant selection, we will move on to analyzing specific cases that reflect the real experiences of students.

Case 1

Stanislav (problems with self-organization).

Context: Stanislav is a graduate of the Economics department. In the first months of his studies, he faced problems with self-organization. The entire learning process depended on his ability to independently plan his time and work without the direct supervision of instructors (Table 1).

Table 1. Student case description: problems, solutions, results

Case 2

Anna (psychological state issues).

Context: Anna is a graduate of the faculty of Psychology. Unlike other students, she did not experience problems with self-organization but faced significant psychological difficulties due to social isolation. During remote learning, she felt loneliness, depression, and a lack of live communication, which led to a decrease in academic activity. This experience showed her how important support and interaction with others are for effective learning.

She noted that despite the availability of online consultations, the sense of social connection and communication was still insufficient for many students (Table 2).

Table 2. Student case description: problems, solutions, results

Case 3

Dmitry (technical difficulties).

Context: Dmitry – graduate of the faculty of mathematics and information technology. Dmitry’s main problems were not so much psychological as technical. Issues with internet connectivity, insufficient awareness of available educational platforms, and technical failures during online lectures significantly reduced the effectiveness of the learning process (Table 3).

Table 3. Student case description: problems, solutions, results

Case 4

Marina (motivation problems).

Context: Marina – graduate of the faculty of archaeology and cultural heritage. Marina encountered a lack of motivation to study in the context of distance education. With the transition to the online format, it became harder for her to absorb the material and maintain interest in the academic subjects (Table 4).

Table 4. Student case description: problems, solutions, results

Case 5

Elena (overcoming stress and anxiety).

Context: Elena is a graduate of the faculty of Sociology. During distance learning, she experienced stress and anxiety due to uncertainty in the learning process, potential failures, and increased workload (Table 5).

Table 5. Student case description: problems, solutions, results

Evaluation of the effectiveness of existing solutions

The analysis of case studies based on real examples of students learning in the context of distance education allows us to identify both the positive and negative aspects of current solutions and approaches applied in preparing students for self-directed learning [2].

One of the key issues is the insufficient psychological readiness of students for independent learning. Existing solutions in the field of distance education provide broad access to educational platforms and materials, but they do not always offer comprehensive support for students in the areas of self-organization, motivation, and emotional well-being [3]. In particular, students who lack experience with online learning face difficulties in planning their time and managing their academic load. This, in turn, leads to a decrease in academic activity and motivation, which affects their success in learning.

Another important aspect is the psychological strain associated with social isolation. Despite the availability of online consultations and support groups, many students feel loneliness and a loss of social connection, which leads to a deterioration in their psycho-emotional state [4]. The lack of face-to-face communication and insufficient attention to students’ emotional well-being in distance education are serious problems that need to be addressed. It is important to note that even with the availability of psychological assistance programs and support groups, they are not always accessible at the right time and do not always fully meet students’ needs.

Technical difficulties also affect students’ psychological readiness for distance learning [5]. Issues with internet connection, technical glitches during exams or assignments create additional stress, which can lead to a negative perception of the educational process and lower students’ confidence in their abilities.

In general, the current solutions for preparing students for distance learning can be considered partially effective. They provide access to educational materials and consultations, but the mechanisms for psychological and social support are not sufficiently developed, which significantly reduces the success of students’ adaptation to the online learning format. It is necessary to more actively integrate elements of psychological support, develop programs for self-organization and stress resilience, and also account for the technical limitations faced by students studying in conditions of unstable internet or insufficient technical preparation [6].

Recommendations for improving students’ psychological readiness for self-directed learning in online format

Based on the analysis of existing solutions and identified problems related to students’ psychological readiness for self-directed learning in the context of distance education, several key recommendations can be made to improve the effectiveness of students’ adaptation to the online format.

Development of self-organization and time management skills. One of the main issues identified during the study is the insufficient ability of students to self-organize in the context of distance learning. To address this, it is important to implement courses and training on time management that will help students plan their learning more effectively. These courses can include practical techniques such as using planning apps, creating schedules with regular breaks, and implementing self-control and goal-setting methodologies. Additionally, universities should actively involve students in the process of controlling their own learning. Regular progress checks, such as checkpoints and interim reports, will help students feel responsible for their educational process and reduce procrastination levels [7].

Psychological support and creation of social connections. Social isolation is a serious issue for many students in the context of distance education, which negatively affects their psychological state. An important step will be implementing a more active system of psychological support. This could include regular online consultations, both individual and group, to address issues related to adapting to distance learning. It is also important to develop platforms for communication between students, where they can share experiences, discuss course materials, and find support. Regular virtual meetings with instructors, seminars, and round tables aimed at improving social interaction will help reduce the sense of isolation and strengthen students’ sense of belonging to the academic community.

Integration of stress resilience and emotional regulation training. For successful adaptation to distance learning, it is important to develop programs that increase students’ psychological resilience. Students often experience stress and anxiety due to uncertainty, technical issues, and the inability to have face-to-face communication with instructors [8]. Implementing stress resilience and emotional regulation training will help students cope with emerging difficulties and maintain psychological well-being. The programs should include elements such as relaxation methods, meditation, exercises for emotional control, and practices aimed at mindful acceptance of the situation. It is also important to conduct these trainings regularly, especially at the beginning of the academic year or semester, when students face the most challenges.

Improving technical support and accessibility of platforms. One of the critical factors influencing the success of distance learning is the technical difficulties faced by students, especially those with limited access to high-quality internet connections or insufficient technical skills. It is important to improve technical support and ensure the accessibility of educational platforms for all students, regardless of their location. Universities can create special online courses to teach students how to use educational platforms and provide additional resources for students facing technical issues. It is also essential to provide real-time support to resolve emerging technical problems, which will help minimize stress caused by technical failures.

Motivation through active engagement and the use of hybrid formats. To increase students’ motivation to learn in a distance education setting, it is crucial to actively engage them in the learning process. Hybrid formats, which combine online sessions with face-to-face interactions, can be helpful in this regard. This can be a blended format of lectures and seminars, as well as online meetings with instructors where students can ask questions and receive real-time answers [9]. The use of interactive teaching methods, such as gamification, group projects, discussions, and practical assignments, significantly increases students’ interest in the learning process [10]. It is also important to implement a reward system for active participation in learning, such as bonuses for completing additional assignments or participating in webinars.

Supporting students in the process of adapting to university life. To enhance students’ psychological readiness for distance learning, it is important to consider not only aspects of self-organization but also psychological adaptation to university life as a whole [11]. A crucial step will be creating special courses or adaptation programs for freshmen, where students can familiarize themselves with the specifics of distance learning, understand how to properly allocate their study time, and develop skills in stress resilience and emotional regulation. These programs can include introduction to learning platforms, consultations with instructors and psychologists, as well as meetings with other students, which will help strengthen students’ sense of community and confidence in the learning process [12].

The implementation of these recommendations will not only improve students’ psychological readiness for self-directed learning but also significantly enhance their adaptation to the conditions of distance education, ensuring a higher level of satisfaction with the learning process and its outcomes.

Continuing to analyze current issues and recommendations for improving students’ psychological readiness for self-directed learning in online formats, it is important to consider the broader context of the development of distance education. Understanding key trends in this process will not only help identify directions for improving existing educational solutions but also predict how the learning process will evolve in the future. Let us explore the main trends in the development of distance education that will influence the organization of the learning process and the psychological preparation needs of students.

Trends in the development of distance education

In recent years, distance education has become an integral part of the educational process, and its development continues to accelerate, taking into account both the challenges and opportunities arising in the era of digitalization. Based on current observations, several key trends can be highlighted that are likely to define the future of distance learning.

Integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and data analytics. One of the prominent trends is the integration of AI technologies into distance learning processes. The implementation of AI will significantly improve the individualization of the learning process by offering students courses and materials tailored to their knowledge level, preferences, and learning style. AI systems will be able to track students’ progress in real time, providing instructors with analytics and recommendations to adjust learning plans [13].

Development of hybrid learning formats. Given that distance education has proven its effectiveness, the hybrid format, which combines online courses with face-to-face classes, continues to develop. This allows flexibility in learning, meeting the needs of students who can choose a convenient time and place for studying materials, while also staying involved in in-person activities, such as seminars and laboratory work. This approach is actively used in leading universities and is expected to expand in the future [14].

Use of virtual and augmented reality. Virtual reality and augmented reality are increasingly being used in distance education. These technologies allow the creation of interactive and immersive educational materials that can be particularly useful for students studying in fields such as medicine, engineering, or art. In the future, as these technologies develop, their use is expected to become even more accessible and widespread.

Mobilization of educational platforms. Mobile applications for distance learning are becoming increasingly popular. Students want to have the flexibility to study anywhere and anytime, and mobile platforms perfectly meet this need. The development of universal and convenient mobile solutions for online courses, with access to lectures, assignments, and even exams, will become an important part of the future educational process.

Forecast of possible changes in the organization of the educational process

With the development of distance education and its integration into traditional educational institutions, significant changes are expected in the organization of the educational process. These changes will affect both the organization of academic activities and the methods of teaching and interaction with students [15].

Redistribution of study hours and reduction of traditional lectures. Due to the growing popularity of online courses and video lessons, there will be a redistribution of study hours. Traditional lectures, which once occupied a significant amount of time, may be shortened or moved to the online format, freeing up time for practical sessions, seminars, and laboratory work. This will make the learning process more flexible and individualized, providing an opportunity to use additional time for self-study [16].

Shift to more personalized learning programs. In the future, distance education will strive for even greater personalization. Each student will be offered courses and materials corresponding to their interests, learning pace, and preferences in education. Modern data analysis systems and AI will help create personalized learning trajectories that take into account individual successes and challenges [16].

Strengthening interaction between instructors and students. Despite the growing popularity of online courses, instructors will remain key figures in the educational process. However, the role of the instructor will change – they will become more of a mentoring figure, focusing on supporting students, answering questions, and correcting mistakes, rather than simply delivering information. Modern educational platforms will actively use feedback systems and online consultations to maintain communication between the instructor and the student, which will also improve the quality of education [17].

Evolution of knowledge assessment and control systems. Current methods of knowledge assessment in distance learning need to be revised. In the future, the assessment of students’ achievements will become more comprehensive, taking into account not only final exams but also the ongoing process of involvement in the educational process. Monitoring systems for students’ performance and the use of electronic portfolios will allow for better tracking of each learner’s progress and the adjustment of their learning trajectory.

Integration of international educational standards. In light of the globalization of education and expanding opportunities for international learning, universities and educational institutions are likely to integrate international standards for distance education. This will open new opportunities for students, providing access to courses and certifications from leading global universities, and will also allow the creation of more universal educational programs oriented towards international requirements and standards [18].

Conclusion

The study of students’ psychological readiness for self-directed learning in the context of distance education has identified key aspects influencing students’ successful adaptation to the new learning format.

In the first section, we analyzed the main challenges faced by students in the online format, including insufficient self-organization, psychological strain due to social isolation, and technical difficulties. These issues became the foundation for further recommendations for improving existing solutions. In particular, we proposed the development of self-organization programs, enhanced psychological support, and the creation of hybrid learning formats to help students feel more engaged and supported.

In the second section, we assessed the effectiveness of current solutions proposed to enhance students’ psychological readiness. It turned out that, despite the availability of educational platforms and psychological assistance, there are gaps in integrating these solutions, particularly in terms of personal motivation and social support for students. It was shown that case study-based solutions do not always take all aspects of individual student preparation into account and require further improvement.

The third section provided recommendations aimed at solving the identified problems, the most important of which include the development of self-organization skills, strengthening psychological support, and increasing technical support availability. It was also emphasized that the future of distance education involves the use of artificial intelligence, hybrid learning formats, and new technologies such as virtual and augmented reality.

Despite the shortcomings of existing solutions, distance learning has several clear advantages, especially in the face of current challenges. It allows students to organize their time flexibly, studying in a place and at a time that suits them. This is particularly important for those who combine study with work or live in remote areas. The online format also opens access to educational materials and resources that may not be available in traditional formats and allows for the active use of new technological tools and learning methods. During the pandemic, distance education ensured the continuity of the educational process, which was critically important for maintaining the quality of education.

In conclusion, it can be stated that the tasks of evaluating the effectiveness of existing solutions, identifying trends, and forecasting changes, as well as developing recommendations for improving students’ psychological readiness, have been successfully completed. The aim of the study, which was to deeply analyze the problems of distance education and suggest ways to address them, has been achieved.

1. Leontyeva I.A. Distance learning as a means of improving the quality of education for students in higher education // Bulletin of YuUrGPU. 2017. No. 6. P. 84-88.
2. Al-Fraihat D., Joy M., Sinclair J. Identifying success factors for e-learning in higher education // In international conference on E-Learning. 2017. P. 247–255.
3. Nikulicheva N. Distance learning in education: organization and implementation // LAP Lambert academic publishing. 2019. P. 220.
4. Dronova E.N. Technologies of distance learning in higher education: experience and difficulties of use // Teacher of the 21st century. 2018. No. 3 (1). P. 26-34.
5. Baisova G. Integration of virtual learning environments with AI to improve students’ practical skills // Sciences of Europe. 2024. No. 151. P. 52-55.
6. Alqurashi E. Self-efficacy in online learning environments: A literature review // Contemporary issues in education research (CIER). 2016. Vol. 1. No. 9. P. 45–52.
7. Baeten M., Dochy F., Struyven K., Parmentier E., Vanderbruggen A. Student-centered learning environments: an investigation into student teacher’s instructional preferences and approaches to learning // Learning environments research. 2016. No. 19 (1). P. 43–62.
8. Antonova N.N. Some aspects of organizing distance learning for students during the pandemic // World of science, culture, education. 2020. No. 5. P. 8-10.
9. Zhaprova S. Implementation of the Moodle distance learning system in higher education // Lambert academic publishing. 2019. P. 112.
10. Mendel A.V. Transition of general education schools to distance learning during the coronavirus pandemic: organizational and pedagogical aspect // National research university «Higher school of economics». 2020. No. 8 (33). P. 21.
11. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change // Psychological review. 2016. No. 84 (2). P. 191-215.
12. Bell P.D., Akroyd D. Can factors related to self-regulated learning predict learning achievement in undergraduate asynchronous Web-based courses // International journal of instructional technology and distance learning. 2006. No. 3 (10). P. 5–16.
13. Brown K.G., Howardson G., Fisher S.L. Learner control and e-learning: Taking stock and moving forward // Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior. 2016. No. 3. P. 267–291.
14. Cho M.H., Shen D. Self-regulation in online learning // Distance education. 2013. No. 34 (3). P. 290–301.
15. Kiyasov N., Larionova V. Distance learning in extreme conditions // Interfax education. 2020. P. 7.
16. Baisova G. Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Educational Programs to Develop Scientific Analysis Skills in a Multidisciplinary Environment // Bulletin of Science and Practice. 2024. Vol. 10. No. 11. P. 410-416.
17. Korneva L.V. Formation of self-control and self-organization within the framework of distance learning in higher education // Bulletin of the state humanitarian and technological university. 2020. No. 1. P. 24-28.
18. Cigdem H., Ozturk M. Critical components of online learning readiness and their relationships with learner achievement // Turkish online journal of distance education. 2016. No. 17 (2). P. 12.

All articles of author «author9834»