<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Электронный научно-практический журнал «Современные научные исследования и инновации» &#187; PPROM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://web.snauka.ru/issues/tag/pprom/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://web.snauka.ru</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 07:29:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>General clinical and specialized medical examinations with PPROM</title>
		<link>https://web.snauka.ru/en/issues/2025/02/103146</link>
		<comments>https://web.snauka.ru/en/issues/2025/02/103146#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 08:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Екубова Дурдонахон Акмалжоновна</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[14.00.00 Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biochemical markers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical diagnostics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflammatory response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neonatal morbidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPROM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy outcomes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preterm premature rupture of membranes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specialized medical examinations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[биохимические маркеры]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[воспалительный ответ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[исходы беременности]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[клиническая диагностика]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[неонатальная заболеваемость]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[преждевременный разрыв плодных оболочек]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ПРПО]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[специализированные медицинские обследования]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://web.snauka.ru/issues/2025/02/103146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[INTRODUCTION Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is a critical obstetric complication that occurs in approximately 2–3% of pregnancies and accounts for nearly 40% of preterm births. It is associated with increased risks of neonatal morbidity, maternal infections, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Early and accurate diagnosis of PPROM is essential for timely clinical intervention and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;" align="center"><strong>INTRODUCTION</strong></p>
<p>Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is a critical obstetric complication that occurs in approximately 2–3% of pregnancies and accounts for nearly 40% of preterm births. It is associated with increased risks of neonatal morbidity, maternal infections, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Early and accurate diagnosis of PPROM is essential for timely clinical intervention and improved perinatal outcomes.</p>
<p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of general clinical and specialized medical examinations in the diagnosis and management of PPROM. The study objectives include:</p>
<p>- Assessing the diagnostic value of biochemical and microbiological markers in PPROM detection.</p>
<p>- Evaluating the role of ultrasound and instrumental methods in pregnancy prognosis.</p>
<p>- Analyzing the impact of biomarker-based clinical interventions on gestational prolongation and neonatal outcomes.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;" align="center"><strong>MATERIALS AND METHODS</strong></p>
<p>This study is based on a systematic review of clinical trials, retrospective cohort studies, and case-control analyses focused on PPROM diagnosis and management. Data were collected from leading medical databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, with a focus on studies published in the last decade.</p>
<p>Study Population:</p>
<p>The analyzed studies included pregnant women diagnosed with PPROM between 24 and 36 weeks of gestation. Selection criteria comprised:</p>
<p>- Confirmed PPROM diagnosis via clinical and laboratory tests.</p>
<p>- Availability of biochemical marker data (fFN, PAMG-1, IGFBP-1, CRP, IL-6, IL-8).</p>
<p>- Documented pregnancy outcomes, including latency period, neonatal morbidity, and maternal complications.</p>
<p>Diagnostic Methods Assessed:</p>
<p>- Biochemical Markers: fFN, PAMG-1, IGFBP-1, and inflammatory markers for detecting amniotic fluid leakage and intra-amniotic infections.</p>
<p>- Microbiological Examinations: Vaginal and cervical cultures to identify infection risks.</p>
<p>- Ultrasound and Cervical Length Assessment: To evaluate pregnancy prognosis and preterm birth risk.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;" align="center"><strong>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</strong></p>
<p>Key Findings:</p>
<p>- Biochemical Markers: fFN showed high sensitivity (60–80%) and specificity (70–90%) in predicting preterm labor. PAMG-1 demonstrated &gt;95% specificity in confirming membrane rupture, while IGFBP-1 was a reliable indicator of amniotic fluid leakage.</p>
<p>- Inflammatory Markers: CRP levels exceeding 10 mg/L correlated with intra-amniotic infection risks, necessitating early antibiotic intervention.</p>
<p>- Ultrasound Evaluation: Shortened cervical length (&lt;25 mm) was strongly associated with an increased risk of preterm birth following PPROM.</p>
<p>- Microbiological Studies: Subclinical infections were present in 40–50% of PPROM cases, justifying routine microbiological screening.</p>
<p>Clinical Implications:</p>
<p>- Combining biochemical markers with ultrasound examination enhances the accuracy of PPROM diagnosis and pregnancy outcome predictions.</p>
<p>- Biomarker-driven interventions, including corticosteroids, antibiotics, and tocolytics, significantly improve neonatal survival by prolonging gestation by an average of 5–7 days.</p>
<p>- Implementing a multidisciplinary approach optimizes patient management and reduces maternal and neonatal complications.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;" align="center"><strong>CONCLUSION</strong></p>
<p>General clinical and specialized medical examinations play a crucial role in the early detection, risk assessment, and management of PPROM. The integration of biochemical markers, microbiological analysis, and ultrasound assessments enhances diagnostic accuracy and informs timely medical interventions. Further research is required to refine diagnostic strategies and improve accessibility to biomarker-based testing in diverse healthcare settings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://web.snauka.ru/en/issues/2025/02/103146/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The importance of biochemical markers in predicting pregnancy outcomes and extending gestation in cases of PPROM</title>
		<link>https://web.snauka.ru/en/issues/2025/03/103145</link>
		<comments>https://web.snauka.ru/en/issues/2025/03/103145#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2025 10:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Екубова Дурдонахон Акмалжоновна</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[14.00.00 Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biochemical markers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-reactive protein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fetal fibronectin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fFN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gestational prolongation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IGFBP-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflammatory markers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAMG-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[placental alpha-microglobulin-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPROM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy outcomes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preterm birth prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preterm premature rupture of membranes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[биохимические маркеры]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[воспалительные маркеры]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[инсулиноподобный фактор роста]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[исходы беременности]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[плацентарный альфа-микроглобулин-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[преждевременный разрыв плодных оболочек]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[прогнозирование преждевременных родов]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[продление гестации]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ПРПО]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[С-реактивный белок]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[связывающий белок-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[фетальный фибронектин]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://web.snauka.ru/issues/2025/03/103145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[INTRODUCTION PPROM, occurring in approximately 2–3% of pregnancies, is responsible for nearly 40% of preterm births. It is defined by the rupture of fetal membranes before 37 weeks of gestation and is associated with complications such as chorioamnionitis, neonatal sepsis, respiratory distress syndrome, and increased perinatal mortality. Prompt diagnosis and intervention are crucial for improving [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>INTRODUCTION</strong></p>
<p>PPROM, occurring in approximately 2–3% of pregnancies, is responsible for nearly 40% of preterm births. It is defined by the rupture of fetal membranes before 37 weeks of gestation and is associated with complications such as chorioamnionitis, neonatal sepsis, respiratory distress syndrome, and increased perinatal mortality. Prompt diagnosis and intervention are crucial for improving pregnancy outcomes and minimizing neonatal risks. Biochemical markers have emerged as valuable tools for assessing pregnancy outcomes in PPROM cases. Markers such as fetal fibronectin (fFN), placental alpha-microglobulin-1 (PAMG-1), and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) aid in diagnosing membrane rupture and estimating the risk of preterm labor. Furthermore, inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukins, offer insights into intra-amniotic infections and inflammation, both of which significantly influence pregnancy prognosis.</p>
<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>This research aims to assess the significance of biochemical markers in forecasting pregnancy outcomes and their role in prolonging gestation in cases of PPROM.</p>
<p><strong>Objectives</strong>:</p>
<p>- Evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and predictive value of selected biochemical markers in PPROM.</p>
<p>- Investigate the role of inflammatory markers in detecting intra-amniotic infections and unfavorable pregnancy outcomes.</p>
<p>- Analyze the impact of biomarker-driven interventions on gestational extension and neonatal survival.</p>
<p>- Provide clinical recommendations for integrating biochemical markers into routine obstetric practice for enhanced PPROM management.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;" align="center"><strong>MATERIALS AND METHODS</strong></p>
<p><strong>Study Design and Data Collection  </strong></p>
<p>This study is based on a comprehensive review of literature, clinical trials, and retrospective cohort studies focused on biochemical markers in PPROM cases. Research articles were sourced from databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, with a preference for studies published in the last decade. The selection criteria included studies evaluating the diagnostic precision, predictive significance, and clinical applications of biochemical markers.</p>
<p><strong>Study Population and Selection Criteria  </strong></p>
<p>The studies reviewed included pregnant women diagnosed with PPROM between 24 and 36 weeks of gestation. Selection criteria included:</p>
<p>- Clinical and laboratory-confirmed PPROM diagnosis.</p>
<p>- Availability of biochemical marker data, including fFN, PAMG-1, IGFBP-1, and inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-6, IL-8).</p>
<p>- Documented pregnancy outcomes, including latency period, neonatal morbidity, and maternal complications.</p>
<p><strong>Biochemical Markers Assessed  </strong></p>
<p>- Fetal Fibronectin (fFN): Evaluates the likelihood of preterm labor in PPROM cases.</p>
<p>- Placental Alpha-Microglobulin-1 (PAMG-1): A highly specific marker for detecting amniotic fluid leakage.</p>
<p>- Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-1 (IGFBP-1): Used for confirming membrane rupture.</p>
<p>- Inflammatory Markers (CRP, IL-6, IL-8): Assess intra-amniotic infection and inflammation associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.</p>
<p><strong> Data Analysis and Interpretation  </strong></p>
<p>Collected data were analyzed based on:</p>
<p>- Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of each biomarker.</p>
<p>- Correlation between biomarker levels and pregnancy outcomes.</p>
<p>- The effectiveness of biomarker-guided clinical interventions, including corticosteroids, antibiotics, and tocolytics.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;" align="center"><strong>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</strong></p>
<p><strong> Key Findings  </strong></p>
<p>- Fetal Fibronectin (fFN): Elevated fFN levels in vaginal secretions correlated strongly with preterm birth risk. Sensitivity ranged from 60% to 80%, with specificity between 70% and 90% for predicting delivery within seven days.</p>
<p>- Placental Alpha-Microglobulin-1 (PAMG-1): Exhibited high specificity (&gt;95%) in confirming membrane rupture, enabling early clinical intervention.</p>
<p>- Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-1 (IGFBP-1): Found to be a sensitive indicator of amniotic fluid leakage, though slightly less specific than PAMG-1.</p>
<p>- Inflammatory Markers (CRP, IL-6, IL-8): Elevated levels of CRP and interleukins were linked to intra-amniotic infection and neonatal morbidity. CRP levels exceeding 10 mg/L were associated with chorioamnionitis, highlighting the necessity of infection surveillance in PPROM cases.</p>
<p>- Pregnancy Prolongation and Neonatal Outcomes: Biomarker-guided interventions, including corticosteroids and antibiotics, resulted in an average pregnancy prolongation of 5–7 days, which was crucial in reducing neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and sepsis.</p>
<p><strong>Clinical Implications  </strong></p>
<p>- Enhanced Diagnostic Accuracy: The high specificity of PAMG-1 and IGFBP-1 in detecting membrane rupture minimizes false-positive results, ensuring appropriate patient management.</p>
<p>- Improved Risk Stratification: fFN testing identifies women at high risk for preterm birth, facilitating timely medical interventions.</p>
<p>- Guided Clinical Management: Inflammatory marker monitoring enables early infection detection, ensuring prompt antibiotic therapy.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;" align="center"><strong>CONCLUSION</strong></p>
<p>Biochemical markers are indispensable tools for early PPROM diagnosis, risk assessment, and clinical management. Findings from this study reinforce the effectiveness of markers such as fFN, PAMG-1, and IGFBP-1 in confirming membrane rupture and predicting pregnancy outcomes. Additionally, inflammatory markers like CRP and interleukins provide crucial insights into intra-amniotic infections, guiding timely clinical interventions.</p>
<p>Despite their benefits, challenges remain in terms of sensitivity variations, cost, and accessibility. Future research should refine diagnostic thresholds, develop predictive models incorporating multiple biomarkers, and enhance accessibility in diverse healthcare settings. By advancing biomarker applications, clinicians can optimize PPROM management, ultimately improving maternal and neonatal health outcomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://web.snauka.ru/en/issues/2025/03/103145/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
