Download PDF

 The discovery of the neutrinos mass (Nobel Prize-2015) means the need to expand the Standard Model/SM, because in SM neutrino is a massless particle with spin Ѕ. This requires a careful analysis of the known concepts of neutrinos in their connection with the experiment. The SM adopted the concept of a two-component neutrino with antiparticle (solutions of the relativistic, quantum equation of P. Dirac). In connection with the establishment of the neutrino mass, the concept of E. Majorana (1937), in which the neutrino, as a fermion, is a true neutral particle, is attracting more attention. This would mean expanding the SM. 
Therefore for experimenters of the non-accelerators physics, the search a neutrinoless double -decays of the nuclei became of particular interest. This means that in the final state of such decays

charged leptons  also carry away the energy of degenerate, true neutral neutrinos:

.

More than three dozen even-even isotopes are known, for which double -decay is possible (with emission of two electrons and two antineutrinos), and as many even-even isotopes for which double -decay is possible (with emission of two positrons and two neutrinos). The existence in nature of more than dozen Dirac double -decays – from  to  – has already been confirmed by experiment.
There are no generally accepted results for Majorana neutrino double -decays.
Since neutrino energy must be transferred to charged leptons in neutrinoless double -decays, the isotopes with the highest double -decay energy are selected from this array. In these searches, the main problem is the background, so the double -decays are excluded from the search base.
At present a number of facilities for observing neutrinoless double -decays are in operation, being construction and designed.
For a decade at depth of 1,5 km, an “ultra-clean” laboratory was built and put into operation (South Dakota, USA – Majorana Demonstrator/MJD Project [1]. The construction is completed, and the latest MJD results so far demonstrate only success in studying the “background” [2].

In this regard, let us again turn to the hypothesis of “vertical” neutrino oscillations (without changing the flavor) [3-5], in contrast to the “horizontal” neutrino oscillation established by the Nobeliates-2015 with changes in neutrino flavors . This hypothesis was formulated [4] after observing the paradoxical realization of the Mцssbauer effect in “resonance conditions”

 – gaseous neon (8.86% ²²Ne).

The interpretation of “vertical” oscillations based on the idea of the metamorphoses of the Dirac neutrino into Majorana neutrino arose after reading of the letter in Progress in Physics [6]. This is possible when a complete degenerate -ortho-parasuperpositronium [7], as a true neutral supersymmetric quantum system, substantively formalizes the status of a physical observer in the presence of Long-Range Atom/LRA (number of nodes/cells ) with LRA Core (), when open for neutrinos a limited macroscopic, two-digit/ 4-volume of space-time “outside” the Light Cone.
The irony of the history of the -orthopositronium anomalies is that the Michigan group of experimenters published fifteen years ago an article [8] in which they disavowed the results of their previous precision measurements (1982-1990) that came into conflict with theory (QED), and thus “closed” the problem for the scientific community.
An alternative to this ambiguous solution is presented in the preprint [9].

The proximity of the values of the nuclear -quant energy

МэВ (Nuclear Data Sheets, 2005, v.106, №1, p.12),

for registering the moment of -decay (the emission of a positron  and neutrino ) in the lifetime method of studying of the -decay positrons annihilation, and of the mass difference between the neutron and proton

 MeV (W.-M.Yao et al., J. Phys. G 2006, v.33, p.1),

in SM it seems random. This fact, with the inclusion of the LRA in the final state of topological quantum transitions, allows us to raise the question on the physical nature of the “resonance conditions”.
Comparison  with  in the “resonance conditions” is assumes a twofold resonance.
Nevertheless, between energy  and  there is a significant difference keV.

The question arises about the width of the prospective twofold resonance. The presence of protons (quasiparticles) in each of the nodes of the spatial lattice of the LRD Coreand the binding ²²Ne nuclei of atoms from the gas medium [5²⁰¹⁸] is the response of a unified field on the topological quantum transition, like a bias current in electrodynamics [9]. The difference is fundamentally, and consists in space-like structure of this response.
When bonding due to the exchange of proton-proton interaction at the  nodes of the space-like lattice of the LRA Core ²²Ne nuclei of neon atoms from a gas at laboratory temperature, the energy

 keV (the gas temperature ) (1)

is frozen for a lifetime of -o-Ps.
There is prospect of associating the difference  with the resonance of the response energy, since the neutrino in the final state of the transition

as well as -o-Ps (through a solitary virtual photon) during its time of life also participates in oscillations “inside-outside” of the Light Cone  [10, 11].
In these oscillation the neutrino retains its flavor (positron neutrino), but acquires an effective (topological) mass, as is characteristic of the transformations of the “left-right particles” in topological quantum transitions [12]. Then the excess mass difference can be represented as

 keV (2).

From (1) and (2) we find  keV.
Interestingly, that the effective mass  is close to the mass of a heavy 17 keV neutrino (a brief overview problem in [13]). An experimental study of this issue, initially very encouraging (1985-1991), was interrupted after a series of works with alternative methods and negative results (1991-1993). The dramatic history of the experimental study of the 17 keV neutrino is similar to the history of the problem of orthopositronium [8, 13].
The closeness of the values  and  led to a new proposal of the experiment, which is called upon to confirm (or refute) the alleged physical nature of the “resonance conditions” as a twofold delayed resonance. The point is that in the energy response (2) there is a term depending on the gas temperature. Consequently, the uncertainty of the temperature of the measuring chamber of the order, quite probable under laboratory conditions, can testify to a different degree nearness of temperature of the measuring chamber in the works [14-18] around of a source of positrons in the radius

 cm

to the temperature peak of the twofold resonance. 
It can cause of the uncertainty in the visualization of the shoulder (its “blurring” [19]) and the extremely wide scatter of its quantitative characteristics  ns∙atm. Thus, the expected width of the twofold resonance is  eV.
The statement of a decisive experiment is obvious: it is necessary to compare the lifetime spectra of positron annihilation from ²²Na in high-purity neon gas in an enough wide intervals of temperature with accuracy ~ 3°.
The observation by the method  delayed coincidence high intensity of the lifetime spectra of orthopositronium component (I₂) and (after its subtraction) more and more precise visualization of a shoulder at removal from “peak” temperature on tails of a temperature range is expected, i.e. normalization by this criterion of the neon position in the set of the inert gases (see Ref. [14]). As the peak of a temperature resonance is approached, decrease I₂ is supposed (up to 2 times; see [3]) and, accordingly, blurring of a shoulder, as takes place according the works [14-18], in which the temperature of the measuring chamber was not fixed. This effect is most pronounced on a positive branch of a temperature resonance, as with decrease the temperature the role of the van der Waals molecules Ne ∙∙∙ Ne grows, and the mechanism of the shoulder formation varies, because non-elastic scattering of the  increased.
The expected result would mean the existence of an additional mode of -orthopositronium annihilation formed by -decay positrons

,

where LRA () could claim the role of the ninth massless pseudoGoldstone boson with all the consequences of this restoration of chirality in a limited 4-volume space-time of final state -decay of type:
“Physically, non-conservation of chirality in quantum chromodynamics is manifest in the absence in nature of a ninth light pseudoscalar boson, analogous to the octet. <…> If the symmetry group were the group  then there have to be a ninth pseudo-Goldstone boson. Its absence is direct experimental proof of the non-conservation of chirality (non-invariance under  ) in quantum chromodynamics” [20].
The Project of a New (Additional) -Physics “Outside” the Light Cone by including in theory the LRA with the LRA Core as massless and space-like quasiparticles, means the extension of SM.

As R. Feynman remarked long ago (“… following the proposal of Gell-Mann”) “… Yang-Mills theory is clearly not engaged in a massless field that would have to leave the nucleus and be noticeable. Therefore, theorists have not carefully studied the massless case” [21].
Of course, such an expansion of QCD does not violate the “color” confinement; however, it retains the functional status of a strong (nuclear) interaction, when its carrier is a quasiparticles-proton () at the nodes of the .

 Download PDF

By the cycle of publications [1] identifies experimental grounds [2-8] and the phenomenology of the expansion of the Standard Model of Physics/SM, which has been in stagnation since the mid-1970s, – The Project of a New (Additional) -Physics “Outside” the Light Cone.
A conceptual breakthrough to substantiate of the supersymmetry, confinement, dark matter/dark energy became possible in the Project due to a favorable set of circumstances. The history of this – “… case – the God of all inventions” – is presented in [12²⁰¹⁷].
For the world community of theoretical physicists, were determining the status of the SM, the experimental epic [2-7] and the critical experiment [8], leading to new knowledge, went unnoticed.
The program of a decisive experiment can change that state.
The main thing in the phenomenology under consideration [1] is the paradoxical realization of the Mцssbauer effect in the final state -decay ²²Na (“resonance conditions”). This occurs in process formation and annihilation of the positronium (-Ps) in gaseous neon of the natural isotopic composition (~ 9% ²²Ne). The presence in the dynamics of orthopositronium (-o-Ps) of a solitary virtual photon opens (with reliance on precedent in theory [9]) a fundamentally new ‘-Physics’ due to complete degeneration of ortho-parasuperpositronium and possibility of -o-Ps oscillations in “Trough the Looking Glass” (-decay ²²Na as a topological quantum transition/TQT)

.

In this case, the canonical three-photon mode of QED-o-Ps annihilation (; antidiscrete trivial topology) is realized in “resonance conditions” as the -mode “inside” (discrete implementation of the trivial topology in TQT;  is the notoph [10] and -mode “outside” of the Light Cone associated with it, where  from point of view of the physical observer/PhO appears as parapositronium/).

Process

excludes, from the standpoint of the standard electroweak interaction, any noticeable effect of changes in the isotopic composition of neon on the output of the long-lived orthopositronium (o-Ps) component I₂ of the lifetime spectra (isotopic effect 10^–7-10^–6).
The experiment showed that I₂ doubled () at a decrease in the fraction of the ²²Ne isotope in gaseous neon from 8,86% (“resonance conditions”) to 4,91% [8].
The only way to justify this result is to postulate the formation in natural neon in final state of -decay ²²Na of a macroscopic, space-like, two-valued () vacuum state, which implements the “resonance conditions” due to the solid-state nature of the Hamiltonian graph on the  nodes of  (atom of long-range action/ALRA with a structured core of ALRA  nodes) and the collectivization of the nuclear excitation  by the condensate  from the neon gas phase (~ 9% ²²Ne) on the core ALRA [11]

.

Because of literary research, it was possible to reconcile all traditional experimental and logical installations under the assumption that -o-Ps plays the role of the PhO(modeling of the PhO reflection) [1]. The apostasy of the Michigan experimental group (Ann Arbor, USA)/2003 and its overcoming were considered in [12].

Will be accepted the Project of the New (Additional) -Physics “Outside” the Light Cone, as an extension of the SM? Since the results of the fundamental experiments [2-7] and [8] were not given proper attention, the question is turned out to the Program of the Decisive Experiment.

Comparative observation of the lifetime spectra of positron annihilation from ²²Na -decay by the method of delayed -coincidences in gaseous neon of the natural isotopic composition high purity near normal temperature (~ 300 K) and of the gas temperature control in the range.It is supposed to observe the temperature resonance: a high intensity of the orthopositronium component of the lifetime spectra (I₂) on the “tails” of the temperature range. With increasing distance from the pick of the temperature resonance, an increase in I₂ is assumed (up to 2 times) and, accordingly (after subtracting the contribution of the orthopositronium component), more clear visualization of the “shoulder” (annihilation of quasi-free positrons), i.e. normalization according to this criterion of the position of neon in a series of noble gases in the experiments of 1965-1975 (USA, Russia, England, Canada), in which the temperature of laboratories and samples was not recorded.2. Comparative observation of the lifetime spectra of positron annihilation from ²²Na -decay by the method of delayed -coincidences in gaseous neon of the natural isotopic composition high purity at a temperature close to the “peak” (see item 1) in electric field of intensity ~ 4 kV/cm, oriented parallel and perpendicular to the gravity. It is necessary to keep the geometrical parameters of measuring chamber and the neon pressure close to the measurement conditions in the critical experiment [8]. The schema of this implementation of the decisive experiment is shown in Fig.1. 

According to QED positronium, is the bound state of an electron and a positron, is a purely lepton state, free from any noticeable hadron effects and weak interaction effects, and its annihilation is calculated with high accuracy in QED. However, the QED standard may not be sufficient to describe the lifetime of the, since positrons forming positronium in substance are obtained from -decay of ²²Na, ⁶⁸Ga, ⁶⁴Cu.
Work [8] confirmed the connection of the annihilation of -o-Ps with hadronic processes. 

In this connection, the data on the lifetime spectra of positron annihilation in liquid and solid deuterium (D₂) [13] and their comparison with similar data for protium (H₂) [14] are interesting. In work [13] measured the short-lived components of the lifetime spectra –  ns (liquid D₂, 20,4 К) and  ns (solid D₂, 13 К), but there is no data on the long-lived component (-o-Ps); in H₂  ns (20,4 К),  ns (13 К) and, unlike D₂, data on -o-Ps are given ( ns at 20,4 К and  ns at 13 К).

Fig.1. Scheme of the decisive experiment: is there a connection between the gravity and electricity? 
I₂ is the intensity of the orthopositronium component of the positron (²²Na) annihilation lifetime spectra for neon of natural isotopic composition (~ 9%²²Na – “resonance conditions”) in a direct electric field of ~ 4 kV/cm, perpendicular to gravity. 
2I₂ is the same in a direct electric field of ~ 4 kV/cm, parallel to gravity.
It is clear that in condensed deuterium -o-Ps is formed in the same way as in condensed protium. The question remains: is the long-lived component -o-Ps missing in the lifetime spectra of annihilation in condensed deuterium? The only work [13] does not give a definite answer to this question.
Nevertheless, it can be taken as a working hypothesis that the marked difference in the lifetime spectra of -positron annihilation in the H₂ and D₂ condensed states is an experimental fact, since there was no precedent in the vast array of experimental information for the incomplete description of the lifetime spectra. Then, the absence of a long-lived component (-o-Ps) in liquid and solid deuterium can be explained by quenching orthopositronium by uncompensated for electric charge and spin by radiolysis products in the blast-hole from a composite ion  with an initial energy of 23.85 MeV because of cold nuclear fusion on the ALRA core. 

Hence the proposed scheme of the decisive experiment –

3. Comparative measurements of electrical breakdown thresholds in deuterium (D₂) and protium (H₂) of high density depending on the orientation of the constant electric field in the vicinity (~ 1 cm) of the positron source with respect to gravity ().Finally, a particularly important realization of a decisive experiment by the scientific community of the erroneousness of the apostasy of the Michigan group (2003), since under the leadership of Professor A.Rich (1939-1990) are created the only installations in the world for a precise absolute measurements of the lifetime -o-Ps and  –

To make control measurements on the modified installation of the Michigan group (2003) by directing the auxiliary electric field not parallel (), but perpendicular (—) to gravity.

For direct confirmation of the connection of electroweak and strong interactions with gravity (phenomenology of the Theory of Everything), one should compare the lifetime spectra of annihilation of positrons (²²Na) in gaseous neon of natural composition obtained in the laboratory on the surface of the Earth and on the orbit of an artificial Earth satellite (in zero gravity) at the fixed normal temperature.

 Download PDF

Positronium (Ps) by its physical nature is a composite truly neutral vacuum system of an electron (e) and a positron (e⁺), since fluctuation of the physical vacuum allow the birth of “out of nothing” of virtual pair (e- e⁺) during the time

s.

The time of the virtual pair of another stable ingredient of matter – proton (p) is

s.

The question is arises: what excludes the birth of a virtual pair (e- e⁺) in a bound state – Ps?
Since all vacuum quantum numbers are identically zero, in the quantum electrodynamics/QED virtual positronium is excluded by hyperfine splitting of the Ps levels, which is characterized by an increase in the ground state energy (n = 1) of the triplet positronium (spin 1) on  and a decrease in singlet positronium energy (spin 0) on .

As can be seen, the hyperfine splitting of the ground states of Ps (1¹Ps₀ и 1³Ps₁) with an accuracy of to electrodynamic corrections is equal to:

eV.

In supersymmetric QED/SQED the hyperfine splitting of the para- and ortho-states of the Ps is compensated – the precedent is formulated in [1]: “… in the case of the supersymmetric N = 2 QED we find complete degeneracy for para- and ortho-superpositronium”.
Therefore, the ability to interpret and adopt supersymmetry in the low-energy limit [1] gives education of the  in the final state of the -decay –, which substantiates the Project of a New (Additional) -Physics “Outside” the Light Cone [2].
Searches for the effect of supersymmetry realization since the discovery of the mathematical formulation (1971), the subsequent rediscovery and recognition of it by the mid-1970s, were carried out and continue on giant accelerators. It is assumed that the superpartners of elementary particles and the effects due to them can be observed at ultrahigh energies. So far unsuccessfully.
The generally accepted representation of supersymmetry is formulated on Wikipedia (01.03.2019 – in Russian):
“It is perfectly established (!? – B.L.) that our world is not supersymmetric in the sense of exact symmetry, since in any supersymmetric model, fermions and bosons associated with a supersymmetric transformation must have the same mass and charge and other quantum numbers (except for the spin) – underlined, B.L. This requirement is not fulfilled for particles known in nature”.
All non-composite truly neutral particles are bosons. Essentially, the supersymmetry formulation corresponding to the low-energy limit was presented by E. Majorana in the theory of truly neutral fermions [3], when yet there were no accelerators of elementary particle, and the coupled electron-positron system already was postulated (S. Mohorovicic, 1934), later called “positronium”.
This addition of the problem of supersymmetry will be further represented as “-supersymmetry” in accordance with previously reasonable “local” causality [4].
In the Project of the new (additional) -physics “outside” the light cone a two-digit Planck mass  becomes real, due to the fact that in the final state of -decay of nuclei of the type  (²²Na, ⁶⁴Cu, ⁶⁸Ga, etc.) each of the lattice nodes of the Hamiltonian graph filling limited volume of space-time “outside” the light cone –  (in the development of the fundamental idea of E.B. Gliner [5] about vacuum-like states of matter – a positive/“+” ingredient of the atom long-range action/ALRA-) contains a quasi-proton () and quasi-electron (), and the masses quasiparticles are equal to the masses of the corresponding stable matter particles. It defines the nature of dark matter/dark energy [6].
In the nodes of the compensating lattice /«–» there are, respectively, a quasi-antiproton () and a quasi-positron (). In a gravitational field of sufficient force, baryon charges are released at the nodes of the core of the ALRA () – dark matter [2] and the interaction of ordinary matter with dark matter become possible due to compensation of the Coulomb barrier by the -lattice [7] and through exchange -interaction.
Obviously, the lifetime of the ALRA vacuum structure in the final state of the -decay of nuclei of type  (dark matter/dark energy) is unlimited: 

, 

and the quasiparticles in the ALRA nodes should recognize Majorana fermions, respectively, ,  and , .
It turns out that, due to the two-valued Planck mass, the energy of ~ 10²⁸eV is realized in corresponding -decays. Such energy cannot be achieved by accelerators of elementary particles. This means that the generally accepted, emphasized above categorical judgment from Wikipedia may turn out to be false. This is evidenced by critical experiment with  [8], which confirmed the paradoxical realization of the Mцssbauer effect in the “²²Na-gaseous neon of natural isotopic composition (~9% ²²Ne)” system in “resonance conditions”.

The incompleteness of the modern Standard Model/SM (in stagnation since the mid-1970s) is also visible in the state of the theory electro-weak interaction:
Wikipedia (08.03.2018 – in Russian): “In elementary particle physics electroweak interaction is a general description of two of the four fundamental interactions: the weak and electromagnetic interaction. Although these two interactions are very different at ordinary low energies, in theory they appear as two different manifestations of the same interaction. At energies above the unification energy (of the order of 100 GeV), they unite into a single electroweak interaction”.
It follows that in the low-energy limit the electromagnetic interactions is not associated with weak interaction, and only  as a model of a physical observer can justify the restoration of their unified nature (due to the presence of virtual single-photon annihilation in its dynamics). Observation of this is possible by the lifetime method (-delayed coincidence) [8] through compensating half energy of the annihilation -quantum (1.022 MeV) by a quasi-positron  in the node of the compensating lattice/“–” of the ALRA.
The initial positron  and neutrino  are born as Dirac fermions, but they accompany oscillation  “through the looking glass” and transfers to Majorana fermions (truly neutral fermions), and the electron  in the composition  is Dirac fermion

It is not known how P. Dirac reacted to the alternative proposed by E. Majorana [3], but in the headings of the works list of P.A.M. Dirac (from 1937 to 1984) name of E. Majorana is absent [9].

In the presented phenomenology of the Theory of Everything, truly neutral Majorana fermions do not require the abandonment of the law of conservation of the lepton number, as is necessary when setting up experiments to search for neutrinoless double decay and neutrino-antineutrino oscillations.

All this means that in the Project of the new (additional) -physics “outside” the light cone P. Dirac and E. Majorana are presented “on an equal footing”.

Everything will determined by the implementation of the Program Decisive Experiment [10].

 Скачать PDF

 Positronium (symbol Ps) is a hydrogen-like atom in which the proton (p) is replaced by a positron (e⁺) – the electron (e^–) antiparticle. Therefore, Ps, unlike a hydrogen atom, is unstable and with the necessity annihilates, turning into gamma quanta (g_a) for fractions of millionth (orthopositronium  – spin 1, odd number g_a, symbols o-Ps, ^TPs) or billionths of second (parapositronium  - spin 0, even number g_a, symbols p-Ps, ^SPs).

This representation of Ps corresponds to quantum electrodynamics (QED-Ps) as part of the modern Standard Model/SM. Today, the reason for stagnation of SM (from the mid-1970s) is already visible: experiments of a number of laboratories (USA, Russia, England, and Canada) with positrons from decay of nuclei of type DJ^p =1^p (²²Na, ⁶⁴Cu, ⁶⁸Ga and so on), from the mid-1950s to the mid-1980s, definitely indicate the fundamental difference between the annihilation of -Ps  and QED-Ps.
It is assumed that in the system “²²Na/3⁺/-gaseous neon (²²Ne/2⁺/) of natural isotopic composition (~9% ²²Ne/0⁺/)” (“resonance conditions”) due to topological quantum transitions/TQT implements single-quantum annihilation of orthopositronium ( MeV) in the presence atom of long-range action/ALRA, which is forbidden in QED due to violation of the law of conservation of momentum.
The observed paradoxical implementation of the Mossbauer Effect [1] allows one to substantiate the phenomenology of the discrete structure of ALRA (the number of nodes  with the ALRA core) “outside” the light cone instead of the counterproductive phenomenology “tachyon”.
To substantiate the phenomenology of ALRA, particular attention is required to the registration of the single-quantum annihilation mode of the -orthopositronium (g_a-quantum/-notoph [1,2]  MeV) by the lifetime method, since the g_n(“start”)-g_a(“stop”) delayed coincidences method excludes registration of the g_a-quantum with  MeV energy.
Indeed, the thresholds of the differential discriminator of the lifetime spectrometer are set to register g_a-quanta in the range (0,34-0,51) MeV.
The ban on registration is lifted if we take into account the interaction of the -notoph with the two-digit () structure of the ALRA. As a result, half the energy of the notoph () MeV is compensated by the interaction of the -notoph with quasiparticle  in the ALRA_(–) of negative mass

MeV) + ALRA _{(– )} (MeV) MeV),

and the single-quantum (single-notoph) annihilation mode of the -orthopositronium can be detected by lifetime spectrometer.

The forerunners of the phenomenology of ALRA in theory were the concept of “vacuum-like states of matter” by E.B. Gliner (1965) based on the general relativity/GR, the “full relativity” by A.F. Andreev (1982) and the mathematical extension of GR by L.B. Borissova & D.D. Rabounski (“zero-space” – a new long-range action, 1997) based on the method of chronometric invariants by L.A. Zelmanov (see [2]).
The presentation of the experimental anomalies of “quiet physics” under consideration, for expanding the SM, was made possible on the basis of the transition from considering positronium in the framework of QED to supersymmetric QED, in which the precedent was established in theory – “… complete degeneration for para- and ortho-superpositronium” [3].
In QED, the mixing of ^TPs and ^SPs occurs in a magnetic field. Operator of energy of interaction of positronium with a magnetic field

it is not invariant to replacing an electron with positron and therefore does not preserve of the charge parity; it mixes the singlet and triplet (m = 0, where m is the magnetic quantum number) states. In sufficiently strong magnetic fields, the “good” quantum number is no longer the positronium spin, but the magnetic quantum number:  – annihilation by 3g_a or  – annihilation by 2g_a. The splitting of the levers of triplet positronium in a magnetic field is determined by the expression

where , eV ( - binding energy Ps, see [4]).

Positronium is a truly neutral system, since during charge conjugation the positron is replaced by an electron and electron by a positron, again forming positronium. Nevertheless, the ambiguity due to the spin of the compound of a truly neutral particle – ^TPs (S = 1) and ^SPs (S = 0) is obvious here. At this stage of phenomenology, certainty is restored by referring to magnetic properties – the magnetic moment ^TPs is 0, and ^SPs is equal to two Bohr magnetons (). Consideration of superpositronium [3] removes the uncertainty (): one can consider oscillations of orthopositronium (a degenerate state of ortho-/para-superpositronium), which admits single-quantum annihilation in the “trough the looking glass”, which, unlike the “mirror Universe” by S. Glashow [5] it is realized in finite 4-volume of space-time in the TQT process at -decays of the mentioned type [2].
As a result, the phenomenological analysis admits: by the action of an effective magnetic field in the through the looking glass, we can justify the small contribution to the energy of mirror quanta || at one-quantum annihilation.
Let us imagine the magnetic field  as the field of a magnetic monopole placed at the center of mass of a supersymmetric (“complete degeneracy” [3]) -positronium . Let its intensity be sufficient to compensate for the positronium in substate m = 0 binding energy W with an accuracy || (equal to the total energy of two photons/notophs in the “looking glass”). Then, from the connection

we get the strength magnetic field of monopole

and the charge of the magnetic monopole

,

where  is the positronium radius.

The Dirac-Schwinger relation of the coupling of an elementary electric charge and a magnetic charge of a monopole is obtained.

.

This phenomenology of a magnetic monopole as a part of a two-valued ALRA₍₎ is essentially justified by a fundamental structure open “at the tip of a pen” when studying vacuum in a chiral (invariant with respect to the direction of rotation) supersymmetric QCD in a finite volume, which is an “ion crystal”:
“In the case of the usual supersymmetric QCD, the lattice of monopoles of charge –1 is superimposed on a similar lattice of monopoles with charge +1” [6].
As was noted by Schwinger in another context, as a result “… a magnetic charge can be used to interpret the empirical properties of a nucleon charge” [7].

The Dirac monopole, connected with a truly neutral compound atom – supersymmetric -positronium , included in the structure of ALRA with the ALRA core, also becomes a truly neutral system. In this sense, the phenomenology of the Dirac magnetic monopole can be compared with the theory of the truly neutral fermion E. Majorana.
The direct statements of Dirac about the theory of E. Majorana, which would seem to provoke a conceptual conflict, are unknown. But the exit the Theory of Everything beyond the light cone, a priori of the Project of the decisive experiment, brings together both concepts of quantum field theory [8, 9].